Red Bull Racing’s Isack Hadjar slammed the team’s launch procedure after the Frenchman fell from sixth to 14th in Barcelona.
Stubborn Poor Starts: Red Bull vs. Mercedes
Red Bull’s poor starts have persisted since the beginning of the season. Even when a clean getaway does come, drivers consistently lose several places in the first lap, as witnessed in the opening races.
Mercedes, in contrast, has reversed early misfortunes. Kimi Antonelli, a junior driver for the German outfit, once lagged behind rivals off the line but has since posted consistent, clean launches for the last three meetings.
Red Bull’s Over‑Technical Procedure
Isack Hadjar declared the launch window “too small” and the system “too complicated.” He credited the fault to the precision demands that exceed a human driver’s margin for error. “I’m not a computer, I can’t hit 0.0001 %,” he told F1 TV.
Hadjar, who qualified sixth in Barcelona, stalled twice at the grid and slid to 14th after Turn 1. He recovered to sixth for the finish but said the “nightmare” start underscored the urgent need for a fix.
Technical Insight from Laurent Mekies
Team boss Laurent Mekies agreed that the power‑unit.1’s narrow operating window is a core issue: “It’s a very good power unit, but the window is very narrow and it makes the launch difficult.” He stopped short of promising a remedy, describing the season as a “learning process” for the year‑one power‑unit partnership.
Mekies added that improvements involved the chassis–unit interface. “We learned a lot about the interaction between the chassis side and the power unit side this season,” he said.
Looking Ahead
Red Bull’s power unit occupies a pivotal position in the launch puzzle. Engineers will need to adjust timing and driver feedback to widen the launch window and lower the dependency on perfect precision.
While other teams have shown rapid difficulty resolution, the long list of variables for Red Bull’s system keeps its prospects uncertain.

