Stéphane Ratel has warned that a spiral of escalating expenses threatens the long‑term viability of the GT3 formula, sparking debate among manufacturers and governing bodies.
Cost pressures threaten the GT3 ecosystem
During the Spa 24‑Hour race, the SRO founder voiced concern that modern GT3 models are increasingly engineered like near‑prototype machines, moving away from the “road‑first” tradition that originally defined the class. Ratel pointed to several manufacturers, such as Mercedes‑AMG, Maserati, Toyota and Audi, noting that the industry now trades on circuits with cars built at extreme performance levels rather than genuine road‑legal platforms.
Engagement with the FIA and GT Commission
When questioned at the GT World Challenge Misano round, Ratel described the dialogue with the GT Commission and the FIA as “purely factual” rather than a surprise announcement. He highlighted that GT3 cars are FIA‑homologated, whereas GT2 and GT4 fall under SRO’s control in partnership with the Belgian Motor Sport Federation. The implication is that a coordinated effort with the FIA is key to stabilising the category.
Lessons from GT1 and the case for a new platform
Ratel drew a parallel with the historic pandemic of GT1, where manufacturers withdrew after the costs exceeded their budgets. “We have to avoid repeating that pattern,” he said, advocating a revamp of the GT3 spec. Drawing on the ACO’s early planning for the Hypercar category, he urged a forward‑looking approach that gives manufacturers time to design compliant road‑legal models.
Manufacturer diversity and the grid future
Ratel contended that sustainability does not require an ever‑growing driver count or manufacturer list. “We can thrive with 7‑8 different brands rather than 12 entrants, relying on more cars per manufacturer and ensuring quality,” he asserted. The current GT3 market sits at roughly 50 % of its former breadth, according to the SRO leader.
Strategic recommendations for the GT3 narrative
Key points raised by Ratel include:
- FIA involvement – A governance model that pressures manufacturers and sets long‑term objectives.
- Clear regulations for new GT1 entries – Should manufacturers pursue a GT1 category, strict homologation rules are necessary.
- Balancing quality over quantity – Prioritising media exposure, spectator interest, and professional standards to keep grid sizes healthy.
- Risk mitigation – Contrasting the DTM’s decline with the need to avoid a Class 1 dead end.
With the upcoming Hypercar spotlight, Ratel emphasises that the appeal of flagship drivers and high‑profile brands— including Valentino Rossi, Ferrari, and others—can raise audience engagement across all tiers of sportscar racing.
In light of the discussions, the GT3 community now faces a decisive crossroads: maintain the current trajectory with limited growth or enact a comprehensive overhaul that partners firmly with the FIA and prioritises long‑term viability.

